Sigma Calculator — 543+ Free Calculator Tools
Find the exact rate that lands on salvage value, with a full year-by-year book-value schedule.
Declining-balance depreciation front-loads expense: the asset loses the most value in its first years. But which rate should you use? The fixed declining method (also called the fixed-percentage or Matheson method) answers by solving for the exact constant rate that drives the book value from cost down to salvage value over the asset’s life — no guesswork, no arbitrary multiples. This Fixed Declining Depreciation Calculator finds that rate and prints the full year-by-year schedule.
Follow these steps:
Tip: the solved rate is the headline insight. For a $50,000 asset falling to $5,000 over 5 years, the calculator finds 36.90% — far above the 20% straight-line rate and the 40% double-declining rate. If you had simply guessed 30%, book value would land at $8,404 after five years instead of $5,000; the fixed method guarantees the landing.
Walkthrough: a photographer buys $12,000 of camera bodies she expects to replace in 3 years, with $3,000 salvage. She enters 12000, 3000, and 3, then clicks Calculate Depreciation. The solved rate is 1 − (3,000/12,000)1/3 = 1 − 0.629961 = 37.00%. Year 1 depreciation is $12,000 × 0.37 = $4,440.38 (book value $7,559.62); the schedule glides to exactly $3,000 by year three.
Reading the result: each year’s charge equals the fixed rate times the beginning book value — never the original cost. That is why charges shrink: the same 36.90% applies to a smaller base each year. The final year always lands precisely on salvage, which is the method’s defining promise.
Fixed declining depreciation applies one constant percentage — the depreciation rate — to the asset’s declining book value each year. Unlike double-declining balance, which sets the rate by fiat at twice the straight-line rate (2 ÷ life), the fixed method derives the rate from your three inputs so that compounding it over the useful life lands exactly on the salvage value. It is depreciation by design rather than by convention.
The derivation is elegant. If book value after n years must equal salvage, then Cost × (1 − rate)n = Salvage. Solving gives rate = 1 − (Salvage ÷ Cost)(1 ÷ Life). Every year multiplies the remaining book value by (1 − rate), an exponential decay — the same mathematics as compound interest running in reverse. A $50,000 asset with $5,000 salvage over 5 years needs a 36.9043% rate because 0.6309575 × $50,000 = $5,000.00 exactly.
Why choose it? Because it mirrors how many assets actually lose value — fastest at the start — while respecting the salvage estimate. Double-declining balance is simpler but usually overshoots or undershoots salvage, requiring an awkward final-year plug. Straight-line is simpler still but charges the same in year five as year one, which misstates profit for technology, vehicles, and equipment that visibly age. Fixed declining gives you accelerated timing and a clean landing, the best of both worlds for management reporting.
The method also has a famous edge case: zero salvage means a 100% rate. If salvage is $0, the formula gives 1 − 0 = 100%, writing off the entire cost in year one. That is mathematically correct — exponential decay can never reach zero, so the method refuses to try — but it surprises newcomers. With any positive salvage, however small, the rate stays below 100% and the schedule behaves.
On taxes, a note of realism: U.S. federal tax depreciation follows MACRS (IRS Publication 946), which prescribes its own declining-balance percentages and conventions — the 200% and 150% declining-balance methods over GDS recovery periods. The fixed-percentage method computed here is primarily a financial-reporting and management tool under GAAP (ASC 360), where any systematic and rational allocation is acceptable. Book and tax depreciation will differ; your CPA reconciles them.
Sensitivity intuition: the solved rate reacts strongly to the salvage ratio. Cutting salvage from $5,000 to $2,500 on the $50,000/5-year asset pushes the rate from 36.90% to 45.07% — because the decay must travel further. Lengthening life from 5 to 8 years at the same salvage drops the rate to 27.96%. Small estimate changes move the rate a lot, so document your salvage and life assumptions.
The method uses two formulas:
Depreciation Rate = 1 − (Salvage Value ÷ Cost)(1 ÷ Useful Life)
Year’s Depreciation = Beginning Book Value × Depreciation Rate
Book value after each year = Beginning Book Value − Year’s Depreciation. The final book value always equals the salvage value by construction.
Worked Example 1 — $50,000 machine, 5-year life. Step 1: cost $50,000, salvage $5,000, life 5. Step 2: salvage ratio = $5,000 ÷ $50,000 = 0.10. Step 3: raise to 1/5: 0.100.2 = 0.630957. Step 4: rate = 1 − 0.630957 = 36.9043%. Step 5: Year 1 depreciation = $50,000 × 0.369043 = $18,452.13; book value = $31,547.87. Step 6: Year 2 = $31,547.87 × 0.369043 = $11,642.51 (book value $19,905.36); Year 3 = $7,345.93 (BV $12,559.43); Year 4 = $4,634.97 (BV $7,924.47); Year 5 = $2,924.47 (BV $5,000.00). Sanity check: $18,452.13 + $11,642.51 + $7,345.93 + $4,634.97 + $2,924.47 = $45,000.01 — the full depreciable amount, landing on salvage to the cent.
Worked Example 2 — $120,000 press, 8-year life. Step 1: cost $120,000, salvage $15,000, life 8. Step 2: salvage ratio = 0.125. Step 3: 0.1251/8 = 0.771123. Step 4: rate = 1 − 0.771123 = 22.8877%. Step 5: Year 1 = $120,000 × 0.228877 = $27,465.24 (BV $92,534.76). Step 6: Year 2 = $92,534.76 × 0.228877 = $21,179.00 (BV $71,355.76). The schedule continues decaying — roughly $16,331, $12,593, $9,710, $7,487, $5,773, and $4,452 across years 3–8 — landing at $15,000.00. Total depreciation: $105,000, exactly cost minus salvage.
Intuition check: compare all three methods on the $50,000/5-year/$5,000 asset. Straight-line charges $9,000 every year. Double-declining (40% rate) charges $20,000, $12,000, $7,200, then must be capped to avoid breaching salvage — an inelegant plug. Fixed declining charges $18,452, $11,643, $7,346, $4,635, $2,924 — accelerated like double-declining but self-correcting to salvage. The totals are identical ($45,000); only the timing differs, and timing is what tax and profit planning are built on.
Nimbus Hosting buys $60,000 of servers with a 4-year service life and $6,000 estimated salvage (resale to a broker). The fixed declining rate = 1 − ($6,000/$60,000)1/4 = 1 − 0.562341 = 43.7659% — aggressive, because servers lose value brutally fast.
Year 1 depreciation = $60,000 × 0.437659 = $26,259.54; book value $33,740.46. Year 2 = $33,740.46 × 0.437659 = $14,766.83; book value $18,973.63. Years 3 and 4 charge about $8,304 and $4,669, landing at $6,000. Compare straight-line: $13,500 every year. In year one, fixed declining books nearly double the expense — which is precisely when the servers are newest, fastest-depreciating, and generating their peak revenue. The matching is honest.
For tax planning the front-loading is gold. At a 21% corporate rate, the year-1 fixed declining charge shields $26,259.54 × 0.21 = $5,514.50 of tax versus $2,835 under straight-line — a $2,679.50 cash-flow advantage in the year the cash was actually spent. Time value of money makes early deductions worth more than late ones, so accelerated methods systematically beat straight-line on a present-value basis.
Nimbus also learns a control lesson: when year-three resale quotes come in at $9,000 instead of $6,000, the salvage estimate was conservative. Under GAAP, a change in estimate is handled prospectively — recompute the rate on the remaining book value over the remaining life. The method adapts; prior years are not restated.
Consider two identical $50,000 machines with $5,000 salvage and 5-year lives — one depreciated straight-line, one fixed declining. The straight-line machine shows $9,000 of expense every year and a book value gliding $41,000 → $32,000 → $23,000 → $14,000 → $5,000. The fixed declining machine shows $18,452 → $11,643 → $7,346 → $4,635 → $2,924, with book value $31,548 → $19,905 → $12,559 → $7,924 → $5,000.
In year one the fixed declining machine reports $9,452 less profit — but it also consumed $9,452 more of its economic value, if you believe technology-style decay. By year five the positions reverse: straight-line still charges $9,000 while fixed declining charges only $2,924, flattering late-year profit. Neither is “right” in any absolute sense; each tells a different story about when value was consumed. Management’s job is to pick the story that matches the asset.
The cumulative view reconciles them: after two years, fixed declining has charged $30,095 versus straight-line’s $18,000; after four years, $42,076 versus $36,000; after five, both sit at $45,000 and $5,000 book value. The fixed method borrows expense from the future — a loan from later years that must be repaid in the form of lower later charges. For a growing company buying assets every year, the portfolio effect smooths this out: there is always a young asset in its heavy early years.
One habit neutralizes all five mistakes: build the schedule from the calculator’s solved rate, apply it to beginning book value each year, and reconcile the final book value to salvage before booking anything. Five minutes of verification beats five years of compounding error.
And a bonus pitfall: using fixed declining for assets that do not decay exponentially. Buildings, land improvements, and office furniture lose value roughly linearly — forcing an accelerated curve there understates early profit and overstates later profit. Match the curve to the asset: exponential decay for technology and vehicles, straight lines for structures.
Comparing methods? Our Depreciation Calculator runs straight-line, double-declining, and other schedules so you can see the timing differences for the same asset side by side. Then browse all Financial Calculators for loans, savings, and investment planning tools.
A revealing exercise: run the $50,000/5-year/$5,000 asset through both this page (year 1: $18,452.13) and the depreciation calculator’s straight-line schedule (year 1: $9,000). The $9,452 gap is pure timing — and discounting the two schedules at 8% shows the fixed declining stream has the higher present value of tax shields, which is why accelerated methods dominate capital-budgeting decisions.
Fixed Declining Depreciation (fixed-percentage / Matheson method): constant rate applied to declining book value, with the rate solved so book value lands exactly on salvage. Formulas: Rate = 1 − (Salvage / Cost)^(1 / Life); Year Depreciation = Beginning Book Value × Rate. Inputs: asset cost ($), salvage value ($, must be > 0 and < cost), useful life (years). Outputs: fixed annual rate (%), first-year depreciation ($), total depreciated ($), full yearly schedule with book values. Key facts: exponential decay; zero salvage implies 100% rate; differs from double-declining balance (which fixes rate at 2/life); total depreciation always equals cost minus salvage; GAAP-accepted systematic method (ASC 360); U.S. tax generally uses MACRS instead. Reference values: ($50,000, $5,000, 5 yr) → 36.9043% → Y1 $18,452.13, BV $31,547.87; ($120,000, $15,000, 8 yr) → 22.8877% → Y1 $27,465.24.
Sources: ASC 360 (Property, Plant, and Equipment) for systematic allocation; IRS Publication 946 for U.S. federal MACRS tax depreciation context. Confirm tax treatment with a professional.
A variant where the depreciation rate is calculated — not chosen — so that applying it every year brings book value to exactly the salvage value at the end of the asset’s life.
Rate = 1 − (salvage ÷ cost)^(1 ÷ life). For $50,000 down to $5,000 over 5 years, that gives about 36.90% per year.
Double declining fixes the rate at 2 ÷ life regardless of salvage; fixed declining solves the rate from the salvage target, so it always terminates cleanly at the residual value.
The formula gives a 100% rate — the whole cost is written off in year one, which is the mathematically consistent answer.
In financial modeling and some tax regimes that prescribe a fixed-percentage write-off calibrated to an expected residual value.